Wednesday, 24 May 2017

Were the Mitanni Aryans really Indo-Aryans?

Mitanni (or Mittani) is a famous kingdom of the 15th-14th century BCE in northern Mesopotamia, famous especially because of the evident 'Aryan' (Indo-Iranian) nature of the names of its kings and deities. 
The most common theory, is that they were more precisely Indo-Aryans, and it is repeated everywhere, although Kammenhüber maintained that the language is still Indo-Iranian and Diakonoff has proposed instead a connection with Dardo-Nuristani people. Mayrhofer himself in his article Indo-Iranisches Sprachgut aus Alalah said that the words used, except aika (see below) are not specific of Indic, but are common Indo-Iranian. He remarked that even when they are not attested in Iranic, since the Old Iranian documents are limited, the 'only Indic' character of the word cannot be proved e silentio.
This alleged Indo-Aryan identity has been used to date the Ṛgveda, suggesting that it must be dated at the age of Mitanni or after it, since the Mitanni Indo-Aryan appears as more archaic than the Ṛgvedic language itself. So, let us see what are the arguments of this identification.

The most repeated reasons of the Indo-Aryan identity are s- instead of Iranic h- and aika- for 'one' (in aikawartanna, 'one turn' of the horse) instead of Iranic *aiwa- attested in Avestan and Old Persian. Now, Iranic h- from s- seems to be a late phenomenon, as Mayrhofer has shown from borrowings into Elamite, it is not earlier than the 8th/7th century BC (see here), at least in Western Iran. The change is attested in the Avesta, the date of which is not sure, but it can be after 1000 BCE (in any case it should not go beyond 1300 BCE), and the region is Central Asia, quite far from Mitanni. Old Persian is closer, but is attested from the 6th century BCE. About Median we do not know much, but it is interesting that the capital of the Median empire, Ecbatana in Greek, Hamgmatāna- in Old Persian, can be referred as Sagbat/Sagbita in Assyrian texts (see here). Also the theonym Assara Mazaš (for Ahura Mazdā) in an Assyrian list of gods, dated 8th/7th century BC, has revealed a Median form with sibilant (see here). On the other hand, among the names from Nuzi we have Artaḫuma, which can be compared with a name in Elamite document, ir-da-u-ma, interpreted by Hinz 1975 as *ṛtā-humā 'through the right Order lucky', and he cites other names in Elamite or Akkadian starting with uma-, like u-ma-a’-pi-ri-a, interpreted as *humāfrya 'Phoenix-dear?' (because the Humā bird in Persian mythology is a sort of phoenix, associated with good fortune). The Persian term humā is derived from Middle Persian humāy and seems to be related with Avestan humāyā 'beneficial; blessed'. So, maybe Artaḫuma means 'blessed through Truth' and reveals a form with aspirated sibilant. It can be due to a different dialect, like Old Persian.    

As to aika-, it is curiously ignored how also in many Iranic languages there are terms for 'one' derived from that root (see here), for instance Middle Persian ēk, Farsi yak, Kurdish yek, Zaza e:k (see here). Nuristani languages, besides Ashkun ach and a Waigali variant ēk, have forms of ev/ew, therefore the Nuristani connection does not seem so strong.
Also interesting is a remark from Raulwing's article on Kikkuli's treatise on horse training:
HERZFELD describes that in 1929, Riza Schah Pahlavi held horse races near the Afghan border of 3, 5 and maximum 9 rounds of 1.4 km (nearly a mile); as HERZFELD enthusiastically points out, “exactly as in Kikkuli’s and Haosravah’s times, and the horses were not tired at all”. 
So, it seems that in Iran the tradition of an odd number of rounds for horses until nine, as in Kikkuli's description, was still alive in the 20th century.

Of course, another strong argument for the Indo-Aryan identity is the mention of 'Vedic' gods in the treaty between the Hittite king Suppiluliuma and the Mitanni king Šattiwaza (here a translation): Mitra, Varuṇa, Indra and Nāsatya.  Let us see how is the reading of the cuneiform texts in the two versions of the treaty, one for Mitanni and one for the Hittites (from Fournet 2010):

DINGIR.MEŠMi-it-ra-aš-ši-il DINGIR.MEŠA-ru-na-aš-ši-il DINGIRIn-da-
ra DINGIR.MEŠNa-ša-at-ti-ya-an-na

DINGIR.MEŠMi-it-ra-aš-ši-il/-el DINGIR.MEŠÚ-ru-wa-na-aš-ši-il
DINGIRIn-tar DINGIR.MEŠNa-ša-a[t-ti-ya-a]n-na 

So, the name Mitra is clear, Indra is rather Indar, and Nāsatya is Našattiya with short a. These are minor differences but we cannot speak of exact identity with the Vedic forms. And all these three deities are present also in the Avesta: Mithra is one of the main yazata or worshipped deities, Indra and Nåŋhaiθiia had become important daēuuas ('pagan' gods, therefore demons), mentioned in the Vīdēvdād/Vendidad (see here). Also Mayrhofer, in the aforementioned article, spoke of 'gods of the Vedic and pre-Zoroastrian pantheon'.
We can also notice that before Mitra there is here the Sumerian sign DINGIR.MEŠ for a plurality of gods. The suffix -ššil according to the hypothesis of Fournet is a dual (as in Vedic mitrāvaruṇau), but there is no confirmation of this, and we would expect the same also for the Nāsatyas who are typically a divine couple. Diakonoff observes that -šši- is the morpheme for abstract words (e.g. šarrašši 'kingship'), and -for the plural. He translates 'the mitraic gods' (belonging to sphere of the god of light). According to Giorgieri, the suffix -šše/i- indicates also concrete objects and nomina actionis (when added to verbal roots).
If we consider that mithra- in Avestan means "a contract, promise, agreement, friendship, commitment", and the god Mitra is clearly connected with agreements both in the Iranian world and in the Vedas, maybe we have to do here with the 'gods of agreements', which would be fine for a treaty. They can also be the spies of Mitra mentioned in the Mihr Yašt of the Avesta (see here).
And what about Aruna or Uruwana? Also these have the sign of plural gods, and the form is clearly not the same as Vedic Varuṇa: the identification has been done only because it is after Mitra, with whom Varuṇa is typically associated in the Ṛgveda. It is interesting that in Hittite texts, aruna- is the sea, and is often listed among treaty witnesses and conceived as a male deity in myths of Hurrian origin (see here). So, maybe the same deity (in the plural 'the gods of the sea(s)') is invoked here as witness? Or maybe it was confounded with the Hittite Aruna for that reason. Now, also the Indian Varuṇa in post-Vedic tradition is the god of the sea, but this is not his main role in the Ṛgveda, and it would be strange to put it besides Mitra as such. Hittite aruna- has no clear etymology, but the Hittite etymological dictionary compares Vedic arṇa 'wave, flood, stream', arṇava 'wave, flood, foaming sea', arṇas 'wave, flood, stream, sea, ocean'. The Indo-European root should be *ar-, expressing motion (of waves).
In order to understand more, let us consider the equivalent (in the other list) Uruwana, which is quite different. Diakonoff denied the identification with Varuṇa and proposed to read Avestan urwa(n) 'soul', 'soul of the dead', so that Uruwanaššil would be 'gods of the sphere of the souls of the dead'.
Fournet, instead, sees in Uruwana a Hurrian version (since initial r- was not admitted in Hurrian) of *Ruwana < *(s)rouaHno, meaning 'the one in charge of flowing waters'. And Varuṇa, being the creator of the water-blocking Vṛtra, would be a metathesis of an older *Ruwana. This etymology is not convincing, but we can notice a parallel phenomenon in Hurrian urukmannu, a metallic part of the shield, if it really comes from rukma-,  that in Vedic indicates a golden or silver plate (from the root ruc- 'to shine'). 
Now, in Avestan addition of u- is regular before ru- and rw- (see here), like av. uruuata 'rule, order, prescription' from *rwata, which is a metathesis of *wrata, since we can compare skr. vrata 'rule, religious vow'. In Avestan there is also uruuaiti 'verbal promise, treaty'.
In Greek we have ρητός (<*wrētos) 'stated, covenanted, agreed', Cypriot ϝρήτᾱ 'agreement, treaty, law, pronunciation', Elean ϝράτρα 'verbal agreement, covenant'.
The concept of vrata is strictly connected with Varuṇa in the Ṛgveda. Jamison and Brereton, in their recent translation of the hymns, even state that his name is related to vratá “commandment” and therefore is the god of commandments. But if the root of vrata is that of speaking and declaring (cf. here), the root of Varuṇa is rather the same as the Sanskrit verb vṛ- 'to cover, screen, veil, conceal, hide, surround, obstruct; to ward off, check, keep back, prevent, hinder, restrain'. One could connect this root with the fact that the Vedic Varuṇa is the god who by his snares (pāśa) punishes and restrains those who transgress his commandments. But another interpretation is that he is the covering or all-encompassing Sky itself, a supreme celestial deity that observes everything, especially the deeds of men.
There are good parallels in Vedic varūtṛ 'one who wards off or protects, protector, defender, guardian deity', and Greek erymai 'to keep off, protect, save'. Varuṇa was the guardian of the cosmic order, called ṛta ('truth'). 
We can do another comparison with Avestan urvant 'seizing' (said of a bird), from the participle *wr-ant- according to Bartholomae: the original root can be different (PIE *wal), but the phonetic evolution would be the same. 
So, maybe the root *wṛ- had given a variant form *wrana that became *rwana and then Urwana. By the way, it is interesting that both *wrana and Urwana are close to Greek ouranos, the name of the sky and of the heavenly god that has not a clear etymology. 
Thus Uruwanaššil can refer to the 'gods who are guardians of verbal agreements or sacred commandments', or to the spies of Varuṇa that are often mentioned in the Ṛgveda.

But let us proceed with the numerous Indo-Iranian names that we find in Mitanni and in the Near East, among the rulers of various cities of Mesopotamia and Palestine, and the charioteers called in Hurrian maryanni. First of all, I would like to cite a name present in a list of names from Nuzi that is not cited in the list given by O' Callaghan in Aram Naharaim. It is given in the forms a-ri-ia, a-a-ri-ia, a-ri-i-ia. There are at least 11 persons with this name, two of them are charioteers. In Alalah, there are 24 a-ri-ia; one of them is also called a-ri-ia-an. Another is a maryanni with chariot, and another is brother of Irteya, a clearly Aryan name (see below).
The name clearly corresponds to Sanskrit ārya, Pāli ariya, Avestan airiia, Old Persian ariya. In Iranic use, it indicates the Iranic people itself, according to Herodotus 7.62 also the Medes were originally called Arioi. In India it was more a social and ethical term, 'noble, freeman' (see this post). We cannot say what was the meaning in Nuzi, but we can suppose that it meant 'member of the Aryan nobility'. A name A-ri-ia is found also among the Median city-lords in Assyrian sources (see here).
Now, I would like to remark some features of Indo-Iranian words in these names that are not Indic but rather closer to Iranic:

Arta-: many Mitanni Aryan names start with Arta- 'Truth', for instance Artadāma, Artaššumara, Artamanya. Now, arta- is typical of Old Persian and Parthian names, and it was found also in Median (see here). In Vedic, the form is ṛta-, like Ṛtabhāga. Moreover, there is a Mitanni name Artaya/Arteya (frequent in Nuzi and present in Alalah), that recalls the old name of the Persians, Artaioi, according to Herodotus 7.61. According to Hesychius, instead, artaioi means 'heroes' among the Persians. Parallels in Elamite documents are IrdayaIrteya (Hinz 1975). The same form Irteya is very frequent in proper names from Alalah.

Aššura-: in some names, we find this element, e.g. Be-ta-aš-šu-ra, Bi-ri-aš-šu-ra, Kal-ma-aš-šu-ra, Ša-i-ma-aš-šu-ra, Šú-na-aš-šú-ra (king of Kizzuwatna). The Assyrian national deity Aššur does not have the final -a, and is normally at the beginning of names. Moreover, Bi-ri-aš-šu-ra is clearly a Mitanni Aryan name (<*Priyāsura), and we have already seen that Assara is used in an Assyrian list of gods before Mazaš, showing a similar form with double sibilant.
However, it is possible that *asura here is not the god, but has the basic meaning of 'lord' applied to human beings, attested also in the Avesta. Bi-ri-aš-šu-ra, for instance, might mean 'dear lord'. The name Ša-i-ma-aš-šu-ra (variant Ša-mi-aš-šu-ra) from Nuzi is interesting, because the first element *šaima- can be compared with the Old Persian *çaima- 'superiority' found in the Elamite U-še-ma, interpreted as *hu-çēma- 'having a splendid superiority' (Tavernier 2007). The Indic form is śreman. So, Ša-i-ma-aš-šu-ra can be interpreted as 'lord of/with distinction'. O'Callaghan observes that he was owner of a horse, and he was father of *Biriazana, a clearly Aryan name that apparently has the word zana, the Avestan, Old Persian and Median equivalent of Sanskrit jana 'person, race, people' (priyajana in Sanskrit means 'dear person').

Bard-, Birid-: Bartašwa (Nuzi), Biridašwa (Yanuamma) are two names that can be variant of the same one, that has been compared with Sanskrit Bṛhadaśva, meaning 'having high horses'. But bṛhad (from *bhṛǵh-ant) is very different from Birid-. On the other hand, in Avestan we have barǝz-, bǝrǝz(i)- 'high', and in Old Persian the name Bardiya, comparable with Biridiya found in Megiddo. In the Old Iranian names attested in non-Iranian texts (see here) we have a reconstructed element bṛdi-, including *Brdi-aspa-, "having a tall horse" (Elamite Bir-ti-is-ba, Middle Persian Burjasp).

-mašda: a name is bi-ir-ya-ma-aš-da, interpreted as corresponding to the Vedic Priyamedha (from *Priyamazdha). But we can see that the form mašda is closer to Avestan and Old Persian mazda 'wisdom'. Names with frya- (<*priya-) are common in Iranic, written pi-ri-ia in Babylonian sources (see here). In Khotanese, an Eastern Iranic language, we have even a form with voiced plosive, bria. It is also remarkable that, as noted by E. Hopkins, compounds with priya- are known in the Ṛgveda only in books VIII, I, IX and X, that are the latest ones: we can suspect an Iranic influence (cf. Talageri 2008, The Rigveda and the Avesta. The final evidence, pp.175-183).

mišta-: Mayrhofer connected mištannu 'bounty' with Vedic mīḍhá- “booty, price for fight”, but Avestan mižda, Middle Persian mizd 'wage, price' are closer. 

-myašda: a name from the Amarna letters, zi-ir-dam-ia-aš-da, has been interpreted as zṛda-myazda 'one who makes an offering of the heart' (O'Callaghan). This form is very Iranic, in Avestan heart is zǝrǝd-, in Parthian zyrd (in Indic hṛd-). We can compare from the already cited list of Iranic names (Tavernier 2007): "*Zṛdiyavauš (Median) 'with a good heart'. Babylonian: Si-ri-di-a-muš."
The sound in Akkadian cuneiform should be an affricate, while Iranic is a voiced sibilant, but it is also considered a voiced sound (see here), therefore quite close. On the other hand, Babylonian is considered a voiceless affricate. We can also wonder if we have to do here with a form with voiceless palatal, comparable with the Indo-European root *ḱrd-.  
There is also a curiously similar name *Irdamiasda, written in Elamite Ir-da-mi-ia-is-da, that has been interpreted as *Ṛta-myazda- "ritual banquet". In fact, Avestan miiazda is a sacred offering of food. In the Ṛgveda we have the form miyedha with the same meaning.

panza-: in the list of the number of rounds with the horses, we have pa-an-za-wa-ar-ta-an-na, clearly corresponding to Indo-Iranian pañca 'five'. If is really a voiced sound, it is interesting that in many Iranic languages the form of the number five has also a voiced affricate or fricative: Persian panj, Parthian panǰ, Bactrian panzo, Pashto pinźë, Kurdish penj.

-ta(h)ma: the famous Mitanni king's name Artatama is written in the Amarna letters ar-ta-ta-a-ma(š) (see here). It has been interpreted through -dhāman as in the Vedic ṛtadhāman 'whose abode is truth or divine law', an epithet of Agni found twice in the late Vājasaneyi Saṃhitā. As a name it is used in the Viṣṇu Purāṇa for the 13th Manu. So, it is difficult to consider it as an ancient Indo-Iranian name, I would propose another interpretation, through an Old Persian *Artata(h)ma 'brave through Truth'. A corresponding Median name *Ṛtataxma is attested in the Elamite form Ir-da-tak-ma and similar. Moreover, many names with Old Persian tahma- are written tam-ma- in Elamite cuneiform.

wašanna: in Kikkuli's treatise, we find wa-ša-an-na-ša-ia translated "of the training area (for chariots)' and interpreted as coming from Indo-Iranian *waźhanasya. In Indic, this root *waǵh- becomes vah-, in Avestan vaz-, giving vaza- 'driving', vazō-raθa 'driving a chariot', vāza- 'draft animal'. There is also an Avestan name važāspa 'having draft horses', and the noun vāša- 'vehicle', but this must come from *wart-, according to the typical Avestan change rt>š that does not seem to be attested in Mitanni Aryan.

Yama: Yama and Yamiuta 'helped by Yama?' (dynast of Guddashuna) are names attested in the Amarna letters, a Yamibanda 'servant or follower of Yama?' was prince of Taanach. In Alalah we have one Yaman (Ia-ma-an). A name Yama(ka) is found also in the cuneiform documents of the Achaemenid period. About Yamibanda, bandaka in Old Persian means 'vassal, follower', in modern Persian banda means servant, and among the Iranic names, we have *Bagabanda 'who serves or supports Baga', written Ba-ka-ban-da in Elamite. The form Yami- might derive from a reduction of the last vowel (the opposite of Avestan Yima, cf. also Persian Jam, Jamshīd), while a feminine Yamī like the Vedic sister of Yama seems unlikely. A cult of Yama as god is not only in India as king of the dead, but also among the Kalash (in the past also the Nuristanis), for whom Imra/Imro (Yama-rāja) is the creator god.

Yašdata: this is the name of a prince from Palestine, written ia-aš-da-ta in Amarna letters. O'Callaghan cites an intepretation from Avestan *yaza-dāta 'given by the sacrifice', but this is not attested. However, a comparable name is found among the Iranic names, written Ia-iš-da-da, interpreted by Hinz and Koch as an Old Persian *yazdāta, and by Tavernier as an extension with the suffix -āta from yašta 'consecrated', a name apparently attested in various forms in Elamite documents. Another similar word is Avestan yaoždāta 'purified', although the first element comes from *yauš 'health, vital force', so we would expect rather *yaušdata.

-zana: among Nuzi names, there is Aššuzana that has been derived from Indo-Iranian *ašwa-canas, that has no attestion in Indic, while there is an Iranic Aspačanā (nom.) 'delighting in horses', attested in Elamite document as Aš-ba-za-na.

Besides the names, there are also the epithets for horses from Nuzi pinkara-nnu and paritta-nnu, that have been compared with Vedic piṅgala 'reddish-brown, tawny, yellow' and palita 'grey': it is interesting that in both cases instead of Indic l we have an r, which is the rule in Old Iranian languages.
Finally, we can also remark that there is no trace of Indo-Aryan aspirated consonants in Mitanni Aryan words, although a way of writing it in cuneiform script could be that found, for instance, in the Hittite name Tudḫaliya.

Thus, we can see that not only many elements have a form closer to Old Persian, Median or Avestan, but also parallels in the Old Persian names attested in cuneiform documents. Forms like bard/birid- and -tama suggest affinity with Old Persian, while others like zird- with Median, Parthian and Avestan. We can suppose that at least two different dialects were present among the Mitanni Aryans, probably a stage of Persian and Median, being Medes and Persians the most ancient Iranic peoples mentioned in Assyrian sources and acting in Western Iran in historical times.
The next step will be a discussion of the archaeological evidence.

Giacomo Benedetti



  1. Thank you for posting on this classic topic . I believe that this is a very significant and practical step ,towards understanding the origins of Mitanni ,given the data which is available to us .

    About the case that both *wrana and Urwana are close to Greek ouranos, the name of the sky and of the heavenly god that has not a clear etymology , we have talked on this before and for those who are reading this for the first time , IMO it is quite possible, that the Greek gods name comes from those forms.

  2. Great overview
    I look forward to part 2

  3. Great article, it would be great to sample the Mitanni elite, assuming there are even any grave sites.

    1. Thanks. Indeed, it would be useful, and there are grave sites, for instance there is a multiple burial with precious objects of the Mitanni period in Tell al-Rimah.

    2. I wish one day DNA extraction would be cheap enough that crowdfunding various projects would be possible.

    3. lets not publicize the location with the goings on in this god forsaken area !

  4. What do you think is the relationship between The Mitanni and the Umman-Manda? Both were mentioned to be ruling over Hurrians and both had Indo-Iranian names. Could it be they're both different names for Iranians?

  5. Good work. This opens a new path on this issue.

  6. There is also Gr. οὖρος ouros 'guardian, watcher' from *wer / *wr:

    1. Thank you for the remark, apparently it has the same evolution as Ouranos. A curious fact is that the root *wer is divided in one meaning 'to observe' and one meaning 'to cover', but both are connected with protection... in any case, Greek ouros as guardian is very good in the semantic context of Varuna.

    2. Ouranos is described as guardian and protector in the Orphic Hymns (I think the word used is φύλαξ phylax), see here:

      For some ancient etymologies of ouranos see also here:

    3. "Some say, however, that it is called Heaven [ouranos] from its "looking after" [ôrein] or "tending to" [ôreuein] things, that is, from its guarding them, from which also "doorkeeper" [thyrôros] and "watching carefully" [polyôrein] are named." Not bad!

      About ouros, I have found that Beekes derived it from *worwos (Mycenean wowo), which would be from the root *war/wor- itself, that has given also the verb orao 'to see, look'.

    4. Yes, ouros and horaô 'must be from the same root; oreuein is a type of oureuein 'to guard'; note also that ouros means "king, guardian, saviour" according to Hesychius.

      I have now a question: the name 'Urwana' reminded me the biblical 'Araunah' (the Jebusite landowner or king):
      a name which is thought to be of the same origin with Hit. arawa, arawanni, Lycian arawa 'free'. If the words for 'free' (to remember the previous post) have come from an Afro-Asiatic root *ħar/ħur- and IE *Har-ya/o-, then maybe Varuṇa as a word was 'contaminated' by some hurrian like (or AA like) form of 'arya'? (like ara-wana > **ħur-ana? + Varuṇa > rwana = 'Uruwana')? Just a thought ...

    5. Thank you for showing this biblical name (I have found a nice short reference: But I do not think Uruwana was influenced from that, the initial vowels are different (a.a against u.u), and also the ending. Rather, I would find more likely that it was influenced from the Iranic word for soul, urvan- (if the form Uruwana comes from the Iranic language, as is suggested by the phonetic law cited in post, ru/rw>uru/urw).

    6. Well, I've also found this intersting article of Sayce about the Hittite and Mittanian elements in the Old Testament:

      BTW, have you noticed that such words like Urwana / aruna / ouranos etc remind also the Sumerian name of Euphrates, Buranum?

    7. I had not noticed, but according to wiki the Sumerian name was Buranuna.

      Very interesting the article of Sayce, but he adopted the old reading Murri instead of Hurri, which brings him to identify Hurrians with Semitic Amorites... seen also as a blond race, which is a mistake explained here:

  7. The Sindi tribe of Kurdistan is a large well known tribe in northern Iraq inhabiting Zakho and Dohuk and surrounding areas. We have some long-term family friends from this tribe. They use the last name Sindi.

    According to Prof. Izady of Columbia University, the Sindis comprised the Mittani Aristocracy and immigrated from the Sindh Pakistan area as early as 3000 years ago, and introduced knotted rug weaving to Kurdistan.

    "The Aryan Period

    As early as 2000 BC, the vanguards of the Indo-European speaking tribal immigrants, such as the Hittites and the Mittanis (Sindis), had arrived in southwestern Asia. While the Hittites only marginally affected the mountain communities in Kurdistan, the Mittanis settled inside Kurdistan around modern Diyarbakir, and influenced the natives in several fields worthy of note, in particular the introduction of knotted rug weaving. Even rug designs introduced by the Mittanis and recognized by the replication in the Assyrian floor carvings, remain the hallmark of the Kurdish rugs and kelims. The modern mina khâni and chwar such styles are basically the same today as those the Assyrians copied and depicted nearly 3000 years ago.

    The name ‘Mittani’ survives today in the Kurdish clans of Mattini and Millani/Milli who inhabit the exact same geographical areas of Kurdistan as the ancient Mittani. The name "Mittan," however, is a Hurrian name rather than Aryan. At the onset of Aryan immigration into Kurdistan, only the aristocracy of the high-ranking warrior groups were Aryans, while the bulk of the people were still Hurrian in all manners. The Mittani aristocratic house almost certainly was from the immigrant Sindis, who survive today in the populous Kurdish clan of Sindi—again—in the same area where the Mittani kingdom once existed. These ancient Sindi seem to have been an Indic, and not Iranic group of people, and in fact a branch of the better known Sindis of India-Pakistan, that has imparted its name to the River Indus and in fact, India itself. (footnote 8) While the bulk of the Sindis moved on to India, some wondered into Kurdistan to give rise to the Mittani royal house and the modern Sindi Kurd
    Expectedly, the Mittani pantheon includes names like Indra, Varuna, Suriya and Nasatya is typically Indic. The Mittanis could have introduced during this early period some of the Indic/Vedic tradition that appears to be manifest in the Kurdish religion of Yazdanism.

    The avalanche of the Indo-European tribes, however, was to come about 1200 BC, raining havoc on the economy and settled culture in the mountains and lowlands alike. The north was settled by the Haigs who are known to us now as the Armenians, while the rest of the mountains became targets of settlement of various Iranic peoples, such as the Medes, Persian, Scythians, Sarmatians, and Sagarthians (whose name survives in the name of the Zagros mountains)."

    1. Dear Kurd, thank you very much for this interesting comment, but about the Sindis I am not convinced that they are connected with Mitanni. Izady evidently follows the common view that Mitanni were Indo-Aryans and thus connects the name Sindi that recalls the region of Sindh in the Indus valley, but at the same time says that Mattini and Millani are Mitanni. About Sindis, another theory is that they come from the Scythian Sindi of the Taman peninsula:
      Scythian/Sarmatian presence is well known in Kurdistan. Another idea that one can propose is that these Sindis are of recent Indian origin like the Sintis of Europe, but I guess they would not be a Kurdish clan in this case.

      About Mattini, they should be the descendants of the Matieni mentioned by the Greeks (, the final ending -ni looks Hurrian as in Mittani, although the vowels are curiously inverted, which weakens the connection. The position of the Matieni between Van and Urmia lake reinforces it, but they were preceded there by the Mannae, a people connected both with Hurrian and Iranian languages (

    2. The name Sindi is curiously similar to Sindh , maybe a common root?. Also Sindi people lived beside a sea. Sindhu is also applied for ocean sometime :

    3. Also the name Sindi,Sindones,Sindianoi may suggest that Scythian languages retained S instead evolving to H , as we see in Avesta i.e. Hapta Həndu = Sanskrit Sapta Sindhu .

    4. Sindhis are genetically distinct from other Indian people. They are genetically closer to Baloch than to other. Also only 17.5% of Indian males are R1a, so majority of Indians are not Aryans either. You're right even in Pakistan, a lot of the military elites are Sindhi people.

    5. The idea that R1a=Aryan is not correct. Most Iranians are J2, and also many Indians of high castes, so we should also consider at least J2 as an Aryan haplogroup, which is also much more common in Greeks and Italic people than R1a which is instead typically Slavic.

    6. It is extremely unlikely that people moved out of Sind in the Indian subcontinent. Sindhu originally is not a proper noun but a common noun meaning river.

    7. "we should also consider at least J2 as an Aryan haplogroup" -- Well, it is present in so-called 'primitive tribes' of South India who are Dravidian speaking in moderate-high frequencies. You may want to see this paper

    8. "The idea that R1a=Aryan is not correct. Most Iranians are J2, and also many Indians of high castes, so we should also consider at least J2 as an Aryan haplogroup" ---> In the recent Narsimhan's paper "Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia" where they found J2a in two "Indus_periphery" males , do you still consider J2 as 'aryan' !! Also, Zoroastrians in india, pakistan and Iran seem to be rich in Y-DNA L also. Do you think that L might be one of the so-called 'aryan' patrilineal lineages ?

    9. Zoroastrians should be a good example of descendants of ancient Aryans, so if they have frequently L, this Hg should be included. J2 appears more and more as one of the most important IE haplogroups. It has appeared in Bronze Age Anatolia and Mycenaean Greece, and it is apparently associated with the spread of Romans, while in India it is common in Brahmins, also descendants of Aryan speakers. Indus periphery is Aryan in my opinion, as it is BMAC and Shahr-i Sokhta where they have found J2a. As I argued in an old post, the Bronze Age cultural area between Iran and Harappa matches very well the Aryan world, especially as we know it from Rigveda and Avesta. Obviously, I use Aryan in the sense of Indo-Iranian.

  8. Thanks Giacomo, quite plausible also more geographically reasonable. I do think that the 4 deities are the same as the rig Vedic ones as well and does not detract from the Iranian character of the Mitanni.

    The gathering of 4 names cannot be a coincidence... The cuniform renderings cannot be relied on as phonetically accurate and the assemblage takes precedence rather than rendering of individual syllables. (BTW I still suspect citer in latin is a germanic borrowing rather than vice versa since it does not have great structure in latin) But let not discuss here.

    1. Of course the assemblage of deities reflect a similar religion, although in the Vedas you always find at least one deity more, like Agni, in the same list, like RV 10.125.1 that is generally compared (
      "I travel with the Rudras and the Vasus, with the Ādityas and All-Gods I wander.
      I hold aloft both Varuṇa and Mitra, Indra and Agni, and the Pair of Aśvins."

      Talageri also remarked that the affinities with Mitanni names in RV belong to the late books. Maybe this is a sign of the Iranic influence during the Jhukar/cemetery H period.

  9. What's your opinion regarding the Old Indic names Arisena- and Somasena- on an Akkadian Agade dynasty tablet dating to 2300-2100 B.C. cited by Harmatta?

    1. I have read that Bjarte Kaldhol, a specialist of Hurrian, has said that Harmatta has wrongly interpreted those names that are actually Hurrian. Harmatta himself gave those names as A-ri-si-en and Sa-um-si-en. Forms that recall maybe modern Indian pronunciations but not Old Indic or Indo-Iranian forms. Mitanni names always present the vowel A as far as I have seen. Harmatta says that A-ri-si-en is different from Hurrian Arišen but I guess Kaldhol has shown that it is the same.

    2. Thank you very much for your response.

      I have read about Kaldhol's interpretation, but I have been unable to track down the specific paper. I'm especially curious about the alleged Hurrian identity of Somasena-.

      In any case I really appreciate your work done here in this blog!

    3. Thank you! I have seen in O' Callaghan (Aram Naharaim, 1948) that Šaumšien is given also there as a Hurrian name, together with A-ri-ši-en and Ša-dar-ma-at as the earliest clear record of Hurrian names in Accadian documents, in a tablet from Samarra dating from before Ur III (so before 2050 BC). He also cites šen as a typical Hurrian root, and it means 'brother' (it has also the form šena, see
      There is a name with Šauma in the Mitanni/maryanni lists, Biriia-šauma, regularly with the final A. There is also Bi-ra-aš-še-n(a), interpreted as Vīrasena by O'Callaghan, but I do not think that it is acceptable. B for V we have seen that is not acceptable, because Indic V corresponds to Mitannian W. And sena should be šaina as in aika- and as Soma is šauma.
      So, I suspect that also there we have Hurrian šen(a).

  10. Good morning my honorous teacher.

    Can you explain more about kurds origins?

    Every body is telling everything and nothing on kurds. Are they of mesopotamian origin? Are they due to the marriage and fusion of hurrians+sumerians+elamits... with medic tribes?


    1. Good question, I do not have a complete answer but from what I know they seem to be a fusion of populations like Hurrians and Lullubi and Gutians with Median but also Scythian tribes. The question is who were the original inhabitants of the Zagros. The fact that the Zagros is the homeland of the Zarzian and Taurus-Zagros Round House horizon, important source of a widespread Neolithic culture, and that genetically the Iran Neolithic people of Zagros have strong links with present Iranians and Indians, suggests that there were Indo-European speakers, and maybe their language was already proto-Iranic. The Gutians maybe were IE speakers, it is interesting that one of their kings in Sumer, Tirigan, has a name corresponding to the Kurdish tribe Tirikan. Another case is the use of Subartu in Sumerian for the northern region, the same area where there is the Kurdish Zibari tribe. I find this book very interesting about Kurds:

  11. Mitanni Indo Aryan appears to have linguistic features closer to Middle Indo Aryan given the very frequent anaptyxis and assimilation of dissimilar plosives. Further more it cannot be compared directly with the language of the Rig Veda since the language of the Vedas is reconstructed language. The only comparison being made is with the redacted form of the language from 500 B.C. So that seems to eliminate the idea that the phonological archaisms in Mitanni that are not "found" in Vedic is a credible argument. In essence, it appears that Mitanni occupies some intermediate position between the Vedic Sanskrit and later Indian and Iranian languages.

  12. Kurds are the origin of mankind .noah.s ark stopped there.

  13. we can make all kinds of allegories, for example the seven in mitanni is satta, it seems more prakritic than sanskrit or anything into iranian has to offer, so on that bases we can conclude that entire language is infact proto prakrit and not even vedic.

    sanskrit - sapta
    urdu/hindi (prakrit)- saath
    avestan - hapta
    persian - haft


    1. I know this argument, but I do not think that from this single word we can argue that we have an Indian-like Prakrit. Assimilation can happen everywhere. Also in Italian Latin 'septem' has become 'sette'. Probably the Hurrian substrate has caused the assimilation in Kikkuli's form. The initial s- instead of h- is not relevant as we can see that it is a late development in Iranic.

  14. Hello Dr. Benedetti
    In case you have not seen the following papers by Russian linguist Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev’, here is the link.
    The Five Waves paper is particularly noteworthy.
    Mayuresh Kelkar